Research & Clinical

Research & Impact

Published evidence, current research, collaborators and the impact of what the evidence can responsibly support.

Published research

Peer-reviewed work and evidence boundaries

The evidence hub for published work, current research and the limits of what the evidence shows.

Published

Peer-reviewed work is identified directly.

In progress

Ongoing research is not presented as a result.

Product evidence

General hydration science is separated from Best Hydrate-specific evidence.

Why it matters

What to know

Read the systematic review and cited literature for review methods, evidence scope, findings and limitations.

Edmonton Journal: Best Hydrate, Austin Swiniarski & Dr. Spencer Proctor →

Research & Impact

Current Research

Our research program is moving from literature review into study development. We separate completed scholarship from work that is still being designed or tested.

Published workOur oral hydration technology review was published in Frontiers in Nutrition on September 23, 2026.
Next studyA follow-on hydration study is in development with research collaborators. No results are being claimed yet.
Claims follow dataPlanned clinical, performance or field applications remain exploratory until directly studied.

Current program

From review to hydration efficacy study development

Published pathway: our peer-reviewed review examines oral hydration physiology, formulation and opportunities for future innovation. It supports discussion of the literature, not a Best Hydrate-specific efficacy claim.

Study development: the next phase is focused on designing practical hydration research with appropriate measurements, controls and feasibility. Protocol details will be shared when they are ready for public disclosure.

What comes next

Build evidence where it matters

Hydration measurement

Develop practical ways to evaluate hydration response using complementary measures rather than a single signal.

Clinical questions

Define useful endpoints and study designs before making product-specific clinical claims.

Real-world use

Study performance, field and access questions only where the setting and protocol justify them.

Research status

We will update this page as milestones are reached.

Published, planned, active and completed work will remain clearly separated.

Research record

  1. Vine G, Persaud S, Swiniarski A, Rosaasen-Uwiera E, Proctor SD. Revisiting the Need for Innovative Oral Hydration Technologies. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2026;13. Published September 23, 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2026.1851906.

Research & Impact

Research Partners

Best Hydrate works with qualified researchers and collaborators to strengthen hydration questions, study design and evidence.

Researchers reviewing scientific documentation together
Clear rolesResearcher, advisor, investigator and company collaborator are distinct roles.
Evidence firstMethods and claims should match the question being studied.
No borrowed endorsementAn individual's institutional affiliation does not imply institutional endorsement of Best Hydrate.

Current collaboration

Dr. Spencer Proctor

Dr. Proctor is Professor and Department Chair in Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science at the University of Alberta and Director of the Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory. He is also Chief Scientific Officer of Best Hydrate and a co-author of our published Frontiers hydration review.

His academic affiliation provides relevant scientific expertise. It does not mean the University of Alberta endorses Best Hydrate or its product claims.

University of Alberta profile →

How we collaborate

Research partnerships

Evidence review

Review established science, identify gaps and refine testable questions.

Methods & studies

Build appropriate protocols, measurements and analysis plans for the question.

Translation

Apply findings only as far as the evidence supports.

Research inquiries

Interested in collaborating?

We welcome relevant academic, clinical and applied research conversations around oral hydration.

Verification

  1. University of Alberta profile for Spencer Proctor, PhD.
  2. Frontiers in Nutrition full publisher record for the published hydration review.

Research impact

Useful questions, appropriate methods, transparent results

Research should answer useful questions and make future product or health claims more precise.

Relevant questions

Study problems that matter outside the lab.

Appropriate methods

Match study design to the claim being tested.

Transparent results

Publish and distinguish findings from interpretation.

Why it matters

What to know

Best Hydrate’s research program is growing; completed work and future questions are kept separate.

Next

Continue through Research & Clinical.