Published
Peer-reviewed work is identified directly.
Research & Clinical
Published evidence, current research, collaborators and the impact of what the evidence can responsibly support.
Published research
The evidence hub for published work, current research and the limits of what the evidence shows.
Peer-reviewed work is identified directly.
Ongoing research is not presented as a result.
General hydration science is separated from Best Hydrate-specific evidence.
Why it matters
Read the systematic review and cited literature for review methods, evidence scope, findings and limitations.
Edmonton Journal: Best Hydrate, Austin Swiniarski & Dr. Spencer Proctor →
Research & Impact
Our research program is moving from literature review into study development. We separate completed scholarship from work that is still being designed or tested.
Current program
Published pathway: our peer-reviewed review examines oral hydration physiology, formulation and opportunities for future innovation. It supports discussion of the literature, not a Best Hydrate-specific efficacy claim.
Study development: the next phase is focused on designing practical hydration research with appropriate measurements, controls and feasibility. Protocol details will be shared when they are ready for public disclosure.
What comes next
Develop practical ways to evaluate hydration response using complementary measures rather than a single signal.
Define useful endpoints and study designs before making product-specific clinical claims.
Study performance, field and access questions only where the setting and protocol justify them.
Research status
Published, planned, active and completed work will remain clearly separated.
Research & Impact
Best Hydrate works with qualified researchers and collaborators to strengthen hydration questions, study design and evidence.
Current collaboration
Dr. Proctor is Professor and Department Chair in Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science at the University of Alberta and Director of the Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Laboratory. He is also Chief Scientific Officer of Best Hydrate and a co-author of our published Frontiers hydration review.
His academic affiliation provides relevant scientific expertise. It does not mean the University of Alberta endorses Best Hydrate or its product claims.
University of Alberta profile →How we collaborate
Review established science, identify gaps and refine testable questions.
Build appropriate protocols, measurements and analysis plans for the question.
Apply findings only as far as the evidence supports.
Research inquiries
We welcome relevant academic, clinical and applied research conversations around oral hydration.
Research impact
Research should answer useful questions and make future product or health claims more precise.
Study problems that matter outside the lab.
Match study design to the claim being tested.
Publish and distinguish findings from interpretation.
Why it matters
Best Hydrate’s research program is growing; completed work and future questions are kept separate.
Next